Nowadays, it is possible to move ocean creatures from their natural habitat at sea and have them relocated in amusement parks for the purpose of people’s recreation. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
In the present era, shifting of diverse water species to various recreational areas for the demonstration reason to general public is feasible. However, there are several merits and demerits associated with such a movement that might be beneficial and problematic at the same time.
The knowledge of people would enhance with the availability of various sea habitats in amusement parks. Authorities could show such lives along with intrinsic details about them; thus, Individuals would acquire immense data when they visit such places to explore ocean lives. Moreover, pupils and students could attain mammoth material about these species, which would ameliorate their learning process.
Furthermore, inauguration of such amenities could assist scientists with their research about these species. Researchers could gain significant data such as their lives and survival due to the ease of access to such distinct habitats. Additionally, museums’ staff members could take care of these species in the times of need, which would help to avoid medical concerns.
In the contrast, these species belong to oceans and could abide comfortably only in nature, rather than in artificially produced amusement parks. Creatures residing in such man-made locations could hinder their survival and might catch severe health diseases. Consequently, they could die due to such a bizarre environment, which could result in even extinction of such unique lives. To illustrate, water of recreational areas gets contaminated after sometime, which is arduous to change or refine due to its quantity, which leads to the demise of these creatures.
In conclusion, I believe that such a movement has many benefits such as educational and information factors, which could certainly outstrip the disadvantages; however, governments should take indispensable steps to save their lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-14 | Chirag Bhardwaj | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-10 | AdekunleAdeniyi | 78 | view |
| 2019-01-10 | AdekunleAdeniyi | 61 | view |
| 2018-01-04 | attaluri Kiran | 89 | view |
| 2018-01-04 | attaluri Kiran | 95 | view |
- A restaurant has placed an advertisement for a manager in the local newspaper Write a letter to the restaurant applying for the job In your letter explain what you are currently doing describe your suitability for this job Tell them when you are free to a 78
- It is more important for a building to serve a purpose than to look beautiful Architects shouldn t worry about producing building as a work of art Do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people believe they should keep all the money they have earned and should not pay tax to the state Do you agree or disagree 73
- A friend has agreed to look after your house and pet while you are on holiday Write a letter to your friend In your letter give contact details for when you are away give instructions on how to take care of your pet describe the other household duties 73
- There are social medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones What forms do they take Do you agree that the problems outweigh the benefits of mobile phones 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...l areas for the demonstration reason to general public is feasible. However, there are several...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, thus, as for, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68928571429 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87669869958 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610714285714 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7840339028 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.538461538 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0816209538704 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0358095330643 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0322762265611 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0483151444784 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254829119801 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.