The charts compare the number of people per household in the UK in 1981 and 2001
The charts give information about the proportions of six different types of families in the UK during the period from 1981 to 2001.
Overall, there were upward trends in the percentage of one and two-member households while the figures for the other groups experienced a reverse pattern over the given period. It is also clear that the two-member family was considered the most common one in the United Kingdom.
Starting at 17%, the rate of single-person households increased noticeably to 26% in 2001. At the same time, there was a similar trend in terms of families of two people, increasing from 31% to 34%.
In comparison, 20% of British people lived in households which had three members, followed by 18% regarding families of four. Afterwards, the figures for these two groups decreased slightly by 3% in the following 20 years. Similarly, those living in five and six-people households accounted for only 8% and 6% respectively. 20 years later, there was a slight drop of 2% for the former and 4% for the latter.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-17 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-29 | trpg143 | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-22 | trpg143 | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | trpg143 | 67 | view |
- The two maps compare the changes of a school campus from 1985 to 2012 47
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in four countries in 1950 and 2002 and projections for 2050 84
- A museum near your home is looking for people to do part time voluntary unpaid work You would like to do some voluntary unpaid work at the museum Write a letter to the museum director to apply for the unpaid work In your letter Explain why you want to do 89
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO 2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The chart below shows the expenditure on three categories with different proportions among residents in the UK 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 409, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...% for the former and 4% for the latter.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93063583815 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81376453784 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64161849711 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.8677602939 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7777777778 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158804663709 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636256386861 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704051787974 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.098122168177 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686952128589 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.