The chart below gives on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
The bar chart compares the percentage of British people donate their money to poor people by different ages in 1990 and 2010 years.
It is clear that by 36-50 ages majority of people gives money to charity in 1990, but by 51-65 ages more people donated their money to poor people in 2010 than others. By 51-65 and >65 ages people generosity significantly increased in 1990 and 2010 years.
According to the bar chart, by 36-50 ages generosity of people dramatically decreased from about 42% in 1990 to 35% in 2010. Over the following ages by 51-65 growth around 39% in 2010, whereas by 18-25 ages rapidly dropped from approximately 17% to about 7%. By >65 in 1990, with just under 35% and rise in 2010, with 35%.
By 26-35 ages people in Britain donate their money to poor people steadly declined in 1990, with just over 30% and in 2010 was just under 25%. Overall, the figures show that by 36-50 and 51-65 ages British people gives money to charity more than other ages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-21 | Kshitij Kasabekar | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | Bao Chau Phan | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | oanhlilies | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | preetsidhu29500@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-26 | cinderel | view |
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 67
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 84
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 67
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 806.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60571428571 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19806222638 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451428571429 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3580199453 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.75 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393757950155 0.215688989381 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.207025693041 0.103423049105 200% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105445009772 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.293028363441 0.15604864568 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734485218621 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.