In certain countries, majourity of people have a deal with the health impact that induced, indeedly in the way of lots of fast food consumptions. Thus, state authority wants to heighten a tax for consuming fast prepared meals. In my opinion, I completely disagree with this view, because this type of act will scare away the middle and lower income groups.
To begin with, the importance of imposing a higher tax will make fast foods unapproachable to poor and retirement people, this will give them freshness energy and addition to cook proper foods at home. While this might cause them some discommode, it is of course, good for their health. However, the taxes will not oppose inflow consumers from buying street's fast prepared food. The government will continue to consume it, that means, also increasing the tax on fast food will have only a critical effect on its consumption, notion and finding solution to this type of problem.
Undoubtedly, the creating awareness about that ill-effects of fast foods are too unthinkable. Majourity of people, who consume the fast foods are actually would aware of its health consequences. For instance, some developed countries in the world, people have compellation about buying the fast foods, so their busy schedule even though, which they are aware of the health problems.
Perhaps, a better solution is to make healthy food more acceptable and available, one of the main reason is to increase the consumption of fast foods are that can be cooked in a matter of minutes. Ready-to-eat meals are available also in supermarkets. As a result of markets, many people are consuming fast foods, and there are healthier alternativesand which they are not handily acceptable.
To conclude, I would say that, increasing the tax on the fast foods, will only dissuade the low income groups from buying them. If the governments, really want to support healthy lifestyle of citizens, of the country they live, they should just pay their attentions for charity.
- 4 More and more people go on touring and travelling What are its advantages and disadvantages Give your own opinion 78
- Some people think that the capital punishment is the most effective way to stop serious crime Do you think the advantage outweigh the disadvantage of using capital punishment
- the graph 73
- some people think that capital punishment is an effective way to avoid serious crime do you agree or disagree 56
- One of consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, if, really, so, thus, while, for instance, of course, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07294832827 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75395371187 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562310030395 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2927880152 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.266666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9333333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356036222695 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115110456953 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437462694084 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184613526916 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606998841982 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.