I disagree with this viewpoint and believe that the imposition of taxes on imported food is of paramount importance to the agricultural sector of a country.
Today there are plenty of opposing opinions about whether countries should impose tariffs on food products imported from overseas or not. Many people hold the view that these taxation systems are non-essential and should be abolished. However, I disagree with this viewpoint and believe that the imposition of taxes on imported food is of paramount importance to the agricultural sector of a country.
On the one hand, those who oppose agricultural tariffs argue that they lead to uncompetitive and ineffective farming practices. This argument highlights the fact that when domestically produced foodstuffs does not have to be confronted with the rivalry from imported commodities in terms of prices, farmers tend to be complacent and lose impetus for refining their products. May developed countries like America, Germany have eliminated a variety of taxes on imported food. Consequently, fair competition, together with a great number of competent farmers, has come into existence. For this reason, the opponents claim that other countries should together remove tariff protection.
However, I personally believe that tariffs will help safeguard breeders, cultivators and the domestic agriculture against the dominance of imported products in their own market. Undoubtedly, without tax barriers, innumerable types of foreign goods will flood the domestic market. It is very unlikely that local produced food could rival these non-domestic food products, especially if the country is in disadvantaged regions like Africa or Southeast Asia. This is the reason why anti-dumping duties have been put into effect by many countries to protect the national agriculture against external threats. In general, tariffs are an important contributor to food security, which must be a country’s first priority under any circumstance.
In conclusion, although many individuals object to the levying of tariffs on agricultural produce, I claim that they have an important role to play in the sustainable growth of a country’s food production.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-25 | Isha Mehra | 79 | view |
| 2021-01-20 | hungnguyen123 | 84 | view |
- Overall it can be seen clearly that the proportion of learners who studied took attended evening classes was higher than that of online and overseas students 67
- I disagree with this viewpoint and believe that the imposition of taxes on imported food is of paramount importance to the agricultural sector of a country 84
- The use of surveillance cameras to deter criminals is becoming increasingly prevalent in many large cities all over the world 78
- The three pie charts compare the percentage of people who learnt English in three different ways in three nations in 2010 and 2015 61
- The table illustrates how many travelers visited six World Heritage sites in Australia every 2 years from 1996 to 2000
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cultural tariffs argue that they lead to uncompetitive and ineffective farming pr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, may, so, in conclusion, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1736.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67320261438 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05023653639 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614379084967 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8902271675 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452177245902 0.244688304435 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152493847151 0.084324248473 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.198550689435 0.0667982634062 297% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282407633817 0.151304729494 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143058819142 0.056905535591 251% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.