The pie graphs show the nutritional consistency of two dinners. Write a report to a university lecturer describing the data.
The two illustrations depict the percentage of ingredients in two different types of meal, namely, macaroni and potato. Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the biggest slice of both types of dinner is carbohydrates. Moreover, the second one in potato is allocated to protein, however, in macaroni is accounted for saturated fat.
Looking at the first chart, the carbohydrate is observed the biggest proportion by 35%. After that, 25% of protein is put at the second stage, followed by other nutrients and glucose which are reached 15%. The last nutrition is faced as saturated fat by 10%.
In the second chart, macaroni which carbohydrate is managed as the highest ingredient (52%), fat is then shown as 20% of the whole proportion. Both glucose and protein come to the balance at 11%. Other nutrient experiences very less percentage just % which is one-half of fat also one-third of glucose and other nutrients in the first illustration.
- Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work rather than on university education 89
- People are having more and more sugar based drinks What are the reasons What are the solutions to make people drink less 78
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 67
- The pie graphs show the nutritional consistency of two dinners Write a report to a university lecturer describing the data 11
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, moreover, second, so, then, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13291139241 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92825217706 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582278481013 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5242679743 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1111111111 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0427226810514 0.215688989381 20% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0204497260474 0.103423049105 20% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0305743724396 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0308981136236 0.15604864568 20% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276945577592 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.