In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for government to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Nowadays, people in many countries have problems with consuming the fast food and it leads to rising number of fat people in the world. I completly agree with this as government should to force a higher tribute to people who eat this kind of meals.
Firstly, thete are some reasons why I agree with government should impose a tax eating too much fast food. For example: hamburgers, sandwiches, beef or meat. Consequently, people can learn to not eat more fast food. Secondly, in many parts of the earth, people know about consuming fast food can lead to fat. Another reason why authority should introduce new laws about eating more unhealthy meals. For instance: when authority impose with tax people can flexible and they accumulate excessive foods and government should force a higher tribute and when this is happening people can know about their body problems.
On the other hand people can enjoy eating too much fast food because it is delicious and people can prepare this kind of meals very fast other foods. Another issue that when people no time eat healthy foods because this types of meals prepared fast and it helps to doing more other things. It is gives energy and great mood for people. After that they have more time for working.
In conclusion, we can see in the world increasing number of problems with health as a result of eating too much fast food. In my opinion where people eat more fast foods the government must impose a higher tribute there and it can lead to people a healthy lifestyle.
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 56
- The graph below the consumption t fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 179 and 2004
- The graph shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017
- People should focus more on solving problems related to the future and should not spend time thinking about the past To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The chart gives the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were styding full time or part time
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1259.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76893939394 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30020947164 2.80592935109 82% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 176.041082164 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477272727273 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 377.1 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0720789029 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9285714286 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2142857143 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389226120772 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152825645643 0.084324248473 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0967552432203 0.0667982634062 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279742900572 0.151304729494 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047941078735 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.86 8.58950901804 80% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 78.4519038076 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.