Television is dangerous because it destroys family life and any sense of community; instead of visiting people or talking with our family we just watch television.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
We live in an age when the majority of people squandering their leisure time watching tv. Therefore, consideration has come to the agenda whether watching TV may put families at risk and can be followed by making people estranged from communicating with others. However, I partially agree with this idea because the TV has its benefits.
To begin with, the first and the most adverse impact of keeping an eye on TV is that it would apply adverse effects on the relationship of the family. As it's known spending time with family or gathering is one of the important elements for any close-knit family. For example, one recent research revealed that those who spend plenty of their time wanting tv are not likely to keep their households Consequently, they are more prone to get rid of being in family togetherness. Moreover, another compelling argument against watching Tv is that the more spend time in front of the television, the more communication skills will be destroyed that people may be faced with a low-level social position. Hence, if the younger members of a family tend to watch Tv instead of being in society, the inevitable outcome will appear not only in daily life but also in the work environment and future academics.
On the other hand, there are some benefits of tv. Firstly, TV has many educational benefits for children and adults. TV can be used as a learning tool both at home and in the classroom. With the wide range of TV channels, it offers us to find the perfect mix of educational programming for your children or yourself. Examples; Book television, the Science Channel, or the Discovery channel. Secondly, TV can provide a cheap escape instead of traveling. Exposing yourself to the cultures of the world can be easily done from behind a TV screen.
To conclude, I partially agree with this argument and considering the points discussed above and assume that long exposure to TV should be avoided and limited.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-07 | ieltsstudent | 67 | view |
| 2021-01-25 | MinatureNomad | 92 | view |
| 2020-03-15 | clarkkent159 | 89 | view |
| 2015-08-14 | priharsari | 40 | view |
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK 78
- Influence of human beings on the world s ecosystem is leading to the extinction of the species and loss of bio diversity What are the primary causes of loss of bio diversity What solutions can you suggest 84
- In some countries there are fewer young people who listen to or play classical music these days Why is this Should young people be encouraged to play or perform classical music 81
- Television is dangerous because it destroys family life and any sense of community instead of visiting people or talking with our family we just watch television To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 92
- Many educational institutions give greater importance to subjects related to science and ignore subjects such as drama and literature Why is this Is this a positive or negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... idea because the TV has its benefits. To begin with, the first and the most ad...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...work environment and future academics. On the other hand, there are some benefi...
^^^
Line 5, column 147, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to tool'
Suggestion: to tool
...nd adults. TV can be used as a learning tool both at home and in the classroom. With...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8765060241 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76081616437 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581325301205 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1217635481 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.1875 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162982521863 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567763276953 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507980763401 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111633701894 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621202591284 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.