The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015.
The table indicates diverse troubles that children mostly encounter in primary school between 2005 and 2015.
Overall, it is clear that in 2005 and 2015 school A encountered more problems compared to School B, however, in 2015 school A had faced fewer problems than in 2005. By contrast, it is interesting to note that school B percentage remained relatively similar in 2015 as well.
Looking at the table in more detail, we can see that following instruction in school A was a major problem, accounting for 42%, compared to school B, which was only 6% in 2005. At the same time, a similar trend was seen in other areas, for example, in reading, handwriting and spelling for school A stood at 22%, 28%, and 30%, compared to 8, 9 and 5 percent respectively. Moreover, listening skills, verbal expression of ideas, and concentration in lessons in School A accounted for approximately 3 times more problems compared to School B in 2005.
Moving to the year 2015, School A and B almost had a similar number of problems in reading ability and handwriting compared to 2005, but in the rest of the areas, the problems had been declined for school A. The major difference for school B was seen in the field of concentration in lessons and following instructions 18 % each. However, following instructions rose to 12 % compared to 6% in 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-06 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 81
- The bar chart below shows figures for annual coffee and meat consumption 78
- Influence of human beings on the world s ecosystem is leading to the extinction of the species and loss of bio diversity What are the primary causes of loss of bio diversity What solutions can you suggest 84
- The number of people interested in cosmetic surgery is increasing in order to improve their physical appearance Why do people do operations to change the way they look Do you think it is a positive or negative development 95
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, moreover, so, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1111.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83043478261 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.901367994 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.39580672 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.444444444 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5555555556 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308837286144 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15332216219 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109469355834 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23822265135 0.15604864568 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0815905548194 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.