The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in different parts of the world. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
The graph illustrates the number of foreign visitor arrivals in global areas over a fifteen-year period from 1990 to 2005. Overall, the number of outbound tourists at different global areas followed the same rising pattern. Additionally, North America was the most visited region by international travellers, while Central and Eastern Europe received the second largest number of travellers.
As can be seen from the graph, in 1990, North America was the most popular destination, at 70 million, over double the tourist number of Central and Eastern Europe, at 30 million. South-East Asia welcomed the second biggest number of outbound tourists, at 20 million, whereas Sub-Saharan Africa and South America served virtually the same number of visitors, at 10 million.
During the period from 1990 to 2005, Central and Eastern Europe saw the biggest growth of roughly 200% to 90 million in the number of visitors, while the number of international tourists in North America and South-East Asia increased considerably to 90 and 50 million, respectively. Likewise, Sub-Saharan Africa and South America reported a slight rise in the visitor number to 25 and 20 million, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-26 | phuongphungyen | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the changes in maximum number of Asian elephants between 1997 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000 73
- In some countries people prefer to live alone more often than in the past Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 73
- The graph below shows the price of bananas in 4 different countries from 1996 to 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 53
- The line graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.03092783505 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 32.9175257732 0% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 26.3917525773 117% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 998.0 937.175257732 106% => OK
No of words: 185.0 206.0 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39459459459 4.54256449028 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.78020617076 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88962275209 2.54303337028 114% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 127.690721649 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502702702703 0.622605031667 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 296.1 290.88556701 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 1.44329896907 485% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6804123711 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 16.3608247423 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.2632297367 44.8134815571 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.571428571 76.5299724578 186% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 16.8248392259 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 4.34317383033 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.94845360825 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0789653476278 0.216113520407 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476244328593 0.0766984524023 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0249235275238 0.0603063233224 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0622078157307 0.12726935374 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192213194889 0.0580467560999 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 8.37731958763 205% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 70.7449484536 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 3.82989690722 292% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 7.45979381443 180% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 8.71597938144 164% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 7.59969072165 118% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 41.2886597938 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 8.54432989691 145% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.