Some people think that planting trees in open spaces in cities and towns is more important than building houses. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is a well known fact that trees in megacities have an enormous impact not only on attractiveness of city layout but also on general condition of city and pollution but currently it can be unquestionably observed that the overriding goal of many cities is building edifices to provide accommodation. Some individuals believe that increasing the level of flora is definitely more crucial than filling free areas with buildings. So, I partly agree with this statement that citizens have to decline the average number of houses in order to pay more attention to planting trees.
On the one hand, there is an explicit speculation that the average quantity of various facilities is too high which means it is necessary to care about air contamination and different factors related to the environment. First of all, trees and distinctive types of plants help to mitigate some of the terrible effects of the modern urbanization process as well as absorb harmful gases emission that is created by factories. For example, nowadays the government of many cities tries to green towns in order to make them totally spotless and create vibrant appearance. In addition to this, well-run cities with right planned structure of tree planting acquire more resilience to the various external influences such as strong winds and floods from mountains.
On the other hand, building houses and skyscrapers undoubtedly improves the level of happiness of residents as well as declines unemployment. Infrastructure of the megapolis significantly depends on the quantity of edifices where high-qualified and affluent companies may provide a positive impact on the economy. Presently, there is a growing trend to move from suburban areas to towns which means a large portion of people want to settle down in cities and building houses will definitely help them to reach the goal.
In conclusion, after all arguments have been clearly discussed, I assume that it is compulsory to find a right balance between nature and modern cities.
- The car is possibly the most convenient and popular way of getting from A to B However due to its impact on the environment and the risk it poses to pedestrians and motorists goverments should take urgent steps to reduce our dependency on this mode of tra 84
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people believe that libraries should be funded while others think that they are useless as we have the Internet Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some people think that planting trees in open spaces in cities and towns is more important than building houses To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The two plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparison where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 290, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...nctive types of plants help to mitigate some of the terrible effects of the modern urbaniza...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...loyment. Infrastructure of the megapolis significantly depends on the quantity of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, well, after all, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1693.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22530864198 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94955008078 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.8527355281 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.909090909 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4545454545 20.7667163134 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.4545454545 7.06120827912 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210054022845 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687370263666 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463914635003 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106020997941 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679177212869 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.65 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.