It’s better to have rules about the type of clothing that people wear at schools or in their workplace.
In the contemporary world, clothing and fashion play a significant role in human life. The controversial question which arises here is that whether it is better for people to wear uniforms in school or their workplace or there should not be any rule about clothing. As far as I am concerned, it is more appropriate for people to have rules for the type of clothes they wear in either school or workplace. I will elaborate on my viewpoint in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, in the new era, life has altered to a complex hectic form in which people do not have enough time to spend on trivial things. If people are not required to have a specific rule for clothing in a workplace or school, they should spend a lot of time each day finding a suitable costume. However, if there is a rule, they can invest that wasted time on learning new material or whatever is important for them. As a case in point, I used to work in an architectural firm in which we did not have any specific rules for clothes. I used to spend approximately half an hour each day to figure out what can be appropriate for that day. I calculated that it means I spend 3 hours each week and 12 hours each month on choosing a very simple cloth. If there was a rule and I was made to apparel a specific costume, I would not squander my time and energy.
The second and equally important reason is that, if individuals are required to follow a rule for clothing, they would not be judged by their costume in school or a workplace. In other words, it is generally believed the way people dress, has an essential effect on other's perspectives about them. Therefore, if people wear a uniform in their workplace, other people would not judge them based on their appearance but on their merit and who they are. To illustrate it vividly, my brother Ali, used to work in a restaurant in which there was no rule on what they dress. Ali noticed his customers' interaction with him was different when he wore different clothes. While he wore neat and expensive clothes, customers were more convivial and wanted to make friends with him and when he wore typical clothes, he did not receive that much attention.
To sum up, all the enumerated above converge to the point that in today's world it is beneficial for people to have rules on what they wear. Not only wearing uniforms help people to save time on choosing a dress, but also it does not allow other people to judge them base on their appearance.
- It s better to have rules about the type of clothing that people wear at schools or in their workplace 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Advertising is the most important cause of unhealthy eating habits 73
- Is it as important for older people to learn and study new things as it is for young people 70
- Now children do not behave as well as the children did in the past Which one of the following measures do you think can help children age 5 10 behave better A Control the time they spend on TV or movie B Take more time to chat with children C Monitor the 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, while, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2031.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 451.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50332594235 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5758573574 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478935698448 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 648.9 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9537408021 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.894736842 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7368421053 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52631578947 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348246993204 0.236089414692 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104613804093 0.076458572812 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104842268695 0.0737576698707 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238807781285 0.150856017488 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11079172384 0.0645574589148 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.