Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
Every individual defines what it means to be an effective leader differently. Whatever it is, there is no doubt that having certain characteristics, such as sound moral judgment and the ability to maintain the respect of their peers, are important. While some people find that the latter characteristic trumps the former in being an effective leader, it is in fact, that having sound moral judgment is a more important characteristic of an effective leader than his/her's ability to maintain the respect of his/her peers.
An effective leader takes the appropriate actions to ensure the general good of society, not merely what benefits the small circle of his/her peers. Therefore, it is not more important for a leader to maintain his/her peers' respect compared to having sound moral judgment. Take for instance, Hitler. He was well-respected by the members of the Nazi party, or in other words, members of his inner circle. However, he lacked severely in sound moral judgment, which led to the mass genocide of Jewish people during the 1940s. While he may be idolized by a few today, his reputation is largely one of a brutal dictator, and not one of an effective leader.
Although extreme, Hitler is not the only example highlighting the importance of an effective leader to have sound moral judgment over their ability to maintain the respect of their peers. One such recent case is Donald Trump. Several members of the Republican party respected him, as well as many American citizens. However, the global community would hardly describe him as an effective leader, in large part because of his wanting moral judgment. Throughout his presidency, he consistently created a divide amongst his citizens: calling Mexicans "rapists", Muslims "terrorists", and the coronavirus as the "Wuhan/Chinese virus". This lack of moral judgment on his part prevented him from carrying out the responsibilities of an effective leader: fostering union among the citizens, promoting public health, etc. Thus, Donald Trump provides another example of the greater significance for an effective leader to have sound moral judgment, compared to their ability to maintain the respect of his/her peers.
While maintaining the respect of one's peers is a significant factor to being an effective leader, it is by no means more important than having a sound moral judgment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-30 | qwertyy | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | Adelaida | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Mayuresh08 | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 34, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...rs. While maintaining the respect of ones peers is a significant factor to being ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in fact, no doubt, such as, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2012.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 378.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32275132275 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15305739673 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486772486772 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9376560419 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.352941176 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2352941176 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05882352941 5.21951772744 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.633323230621 0.243740707755 260% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.223867353566 0.0831039109588 269% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.184758641774 0.0758088955206 244% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.469958250217 0.150359130593 313% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686259193049 0.0667264976115 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.