It has been claimed that workers over 50 are not responsive to rapidly changing ideas in the modern workplace and that for this reason younger workers are to be preferred. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days, the ideas in modern work environments have been changing, thus it is believed that workers over 50 will not respond quickly to this and it is better to employ younger people as replacements. In my opinion, I partially agree with this view.
To begin with, there are several reasons for employers to use older workers at workplace. Firstly, it is certainly true that older employees have more work experiences than younger people that are indispensable in any environment. Obviously, in addition to necessary knowledge of a job at workplace, experience is also a thing which employers need and this factor can be satisfied completely by older employees. Secondly, loyal factor is also connected with old workers. Undoubtedly, workers over 50 often tend to find stable jobs, whereas young people don’t have trend of working in a kind of job for a long period of time.
However, young employees also have some remarkable qualifications which can convince employers to hire them. Responding rapidly to the changes in modern work places is the first important element which can be clearly observed in young workers. For example, as the fast development of the high-tech industry, youngsters will acquire new technology easier and quicker than older people and this brings many benefits to companies. Furthermore, young people have capacities to deal with pressures at work environments better than older ones. There are many pieces of evidence showed that the majority of older workers quit their jobs because they cannot bear an enormous amount of pressures at work.
In conclusion, I think that a mix of best qualities of old and young is preferential to ensure the most productive environment evolves.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-09 | Amal Azimov | 78 | view |
| 2021-02-09 | Amal Azimov | 73 | view |
| 2021-02-09 | Amal Azimov | 90 | view |
| 2021-02-09 | Amal Azimov | 56 | view |
| 2021-02-09 | Amal Azimov | 73 | view |
- The graph below gives information about the progress of certain diseases during childhood between 1950 and 2000 in a developing country
- The graph below gives information about the progress of certain diseases during childhood between 1950 and 2000 in a developing country 67
- The charts below give information on UK spending habits for books bought over the internet Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below gives information about the progress of certain diseases during childhood between 1950 and 2000 in a developing country 67
- The graph below gives information about the progress of certain diseases during childhood between 1950 and 2000 in a developing country 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 564, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'trended'.
Suggestion: trended
...e jobs, whereas young people don’t have trend of working in a kind of job for a long ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 609, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... of working in a kind of job for a long period of time. However, young employees also have so...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 35, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the best'.
Suggestion: of the best
...ork. In conclusion, I think that a mix of best qualities of old and young is preferent...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, whereas, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17625899281 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85018547981 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586330935252 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1468347328 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.692307692 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.2307692308 7.06120827912 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180804375456 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647258628736 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663748590571 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114340735245 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0882425206172 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.