The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050
The pie chart given below illustrates the age of Yemen and Italy populations in 2000 and the projections for 2050. The data is measured in percentage. Overall, it can be seen that there was a significant increase in Yemen society who are in 15-59 years, while Italy fell markedly.
First of all, looking in Yemen, in 2000, the biggest group was children that were 0-14 age, it got a half. The number decreased suddenly to 37% in 2050. Initially, 15-59 years was the second position in 2000 which had 46,3%, after fifty years, it dominated the population at 57,3%. Less change was seen on age 60+, stood at 3,6% in 2000, this figure predicted got 5,6% in 2050.
Turning into details of Italy, 15-59 years group had 61,6% representing the hugest population throughout another country, although still large, however, this number dropped to only 46,2% in 2050. In contrast, 60+ years showed a dramatic jump, it got less than a quarter in 2000, by 20250 it had 42,3%. Society under 15 years of age only had 14,3%, unfortunately, in 2050 it was decline to 11,5%.
- The Charts Below Show US Spending Patterns between 1966 and 1996 78
- The Two Pie Charts Below Show Some Employment patterns in Great Britain 1992 73
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050 84
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about the consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, second, so, still, while, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75675675676 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48959852255 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621621621622 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4599811587 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313513161592 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134575104737 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.182582821161 0.0843802449381 216% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236345994252 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137599781968 0.0819641961636 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.