The bar chart below shows the three main causes of land damage in four different areas in the world.
The chart provides information about the areas of land damaged by human activities in four major continents of the world.
Overall, the largest amount of damaged land can be observed in Africa and Asia, with over 1000 million hectares each. By contrast, Australia and Europe each have a third of that amount of degraded land. It is also noticeable that while the major reasons for spoiled land in Africa, Australia, and Europe are breeding, in Asia, they are farming and tree-cutting.
As for details, breeding as the leading cause of soil degradation affects 500 hectares in Africa, almost 200 in Australia, and slightly more than 100 in Europe. Other two causes follow similar patterns, with logging coming second and farming the last.
Turning to Asia, we can see that the pattern is reversed. Deforestation affects about 450 hectares, while farming activities damage marginally less, at around 420 hectares. However, breeding appears to the least detrimental issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-08 | nathalie | view | |
| 2021-12-08 | nathalie | view | |
| 2021-02-11 | fmichela | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-01 | Anastasia0511 | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-01 | Anastasia0511 | 78 | view |
- The table gives information about the land covered by forests in various countries in 1990 and 2005 with a forecast for 2015 78
- The chart gives a more detailed look at changes in the consumption of such personal items as stereos tennis racquets perfumes CDs toys and photographic films in four selected European countries 78
- The reading states that laser vision correction surgery is unlikely become popular due to medical and economic problems The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article She thinks that this operation is likely rise in demand 65
- Whereas the author of the reading says that these television appearance is of a great benefit to everyone the lecture cast doubts on the main points made in the reading providing three reasons 76
- The maps below show a science park in 2008 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, second, so, third, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23717948718 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63219678117 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8549891495 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7777777778 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162574283523 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636709855991 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0872756812157 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114775890333 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110018634463 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.