From the dawn of civilization, rules have always played an important role in every society and youngsters as a part of communities have to oblige them, too. Although it seems plausible at first glimpse that today's rules are too stringent for junior citizens of society, I have enough reasons to counter this point of view. I will enlarge on what I mean in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, if people in a society do not obey rules, the society will have a chaotic condition, and youths are no exception. So, rules in communities should not be considered too strict since they are passed for our calmness. To be more exact, everybody can do whatever he/she wants which can be detrimental for others unless some rules prevent them from doing those things. This is especially true of youngsters who have a lot of energy as they are in a specific stage of their lives. Hence, young members of societies are expected to follow today's laws, even if those laws seem strict, in order to maintain relaxing circumstances of communities.
Secondly, today's rules are passed by those who were also young at one time and some of them are young nowadays. Therefore, they are cognizant of youngsters’ situations and they do not make laws which are too strict to obey. To clarify this point, always do rulers try to see all generations of society as a whole and youths are included in this process as much as others. As a way of illustration, take speed limit law; even though youngster may find them too strict, rulers believe that they are necessary for preserving societies. If youngsters go as fast as possible, it is more likely that they cannot handle their cars which raise the risk of fatal accidents. This is more possible to happen when old people who cannot react rapidly are driving in other cars which are next to youngster's cars. Not only, is this harmful to junior citizens, but also it is dangerous for other generations. Hence, rulers have to regard all members of community when they want to pass a law. That is why today's rules are not too stringent for youths as they seem.
To sum up, all things considered, I firmly believe that young people are expected to follow laws which are not too stringent, given the fact that, without rules, society will not be reliable and laws should be seen from different aspects with which we will figure out that today's rules are not too strict for youngsters.
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parent s jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parent s job 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It was easier to achieve success in the past than it is today 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, i mean, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1994.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71394799054 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54085760934 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501182033097 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0408658506 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.777777778 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240051203478 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783211127154 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591991428084 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169224338714 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442961370633 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.