The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
The line graph compares amounts of travelers to Caribbean island over a perid of 7 years.
Overall, from 2010 to 2017, the total number of tourists visiting rose dramatically to a peak. However, the smallest number of people staying on island.
It is clear that, in 2010 visitors staying on cruis ships millions of visitors significantly increased from about 0,2 in 2010 to around 2 millions in 2017. Over the 5 years period the visitors staying on island rose considerably from approximately 0,7 in 2010 to 1,5 in 2015 but in 2016 negligible amount decreased about 1,2 millions of visitors, in 2017 overtook, with 1,5 tourists visiting to Caribbean island.
According to the line graph, the total number of tourists visits increased from just over 0,9 in 2010 to just under 2,1 in 2013. In 2014 close to 2,5 millions of tourists. Moreover, in 2015 to 2016 do not increased ir decreased but in 2017 rose significantly to peak of the graph around 3,5 millions number of tourists visits a Carabbean island. From the graph we can see in the total has more visits to island than others.
- The pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 100
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 78
- The Internet has as many disadvantages as it does advantages To what extent do you agree with this statement 73
- The chart below gives on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 67
- The chart gives information about Southland s main export s in 2000 2021 and future projections for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '2 million'.
Suggestion: 2 million
...016 negligible amount decreased about 1,2 millions of visitors, in 2017 overtook, with 1,5 to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '5 million'.
Suggestion: 5 million
...t under 2,1 in 2013. In 2014 close to 2,5 millions of tourists. Moreover, in 2015 to 2016 do ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8085106383 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68144201525 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489361702128 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.354382467 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.444444444 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376985356185 0.215688989381 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171162227309 0.103423049105 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827187288768 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248686334307 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638019240885 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.