the charts below show the proportion of income spent on different areas by one university, in 2005 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given diagrams illustrate the proportion of income for 6 main categories in a university between 2005 and 2015. A quick overview of the chart reveals that the university spent most money on teaching and research throughout the time surveyed.
Looking at details, in 2005, the percentage of income university spent on teaching and research was the highest compared to 5 other areas, with more than a half of the total. The figure for libraries and maintaining campuses was the same, with a figure for each area was 10%. Meanwhile, the proportion of money used for administration and management was lower than that for accommodation, at 6% and 16% respectively.
In contrast, the figure of income investigated in teaching and research went down slightly but still remanded the greatest figure of the chart in 2015. The figure for libraries decreased to 5% while the percentage of money used for maintaining campuses stabled. A similar trend could be observed in the figure for administration and management and accommodation with 16% and 8% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-23 | Trinh Phuong | 94 | view |
- In some countries most people prefer to rent their homes rather than buying them What are the advantages and disadvantages of renting a home 67
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which maybe unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The media should limit how much bad news they report because it discourages people from doing activities which usually involve very little risk To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five year period Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The chart below shows information about the use of public transportation in one country by age group and location of the residents in 2016 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, still, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16860465116 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10468926899 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.4690759712 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.125 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134809964258 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717048442966 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726189857911 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118105945913 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809814388291 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.