Some say that it would be better if the majority of employees worked from home instead of travelling to a workplace everyday.
Do you think the advantages of working from home outweigh the disadvantages?
Homeworking is an issue that has recently sparked a myriad of controversial debates. There is a school of thought which contends that teleworking instead of daily travelling to the place of work would do both individuals and society better. I side with this opinion.
One of the main reasons why home working would be beneficial to workers is the boost for staff satisfaction. By working in the private area, employees can manage their own time and strike a balance between work and rest. Similarly important is that, without the presence of their immediate supervisors, they would feel less stressed and more comfortable. These two parameters both play a critical role in job satisfaction and productivity.
Another point to note is that several road accidents are partly attributed to daily commuting to working places. Needless to say, home working would serve as the optimal solution to this problem. This argument rests on the fact that working from home spares job holders from the need of engaging in traffic during peak hours, which would, in turn, minimise substantially the probability of vehicle accidents on the way to the office.
Some may argue that integrating homeworking in one’s business would result in the loss of team spirit and difficulty in staff training. This notion is fallacious. With the advent of the Internet, numerous applications and websites emerge, providing workers and their colleagues with the most effective communication tools to increase mutual interactions at ease. Furthermore, the familiarization of young generations with online learning is a facilitator for their grasp of pre-recorded training videos.
In conclusion, there are various benefits obtained from homeworking, e.g, enhancing employees’ satisfaction and reducing traffic accidents. The pessimism about the lack of team interactions and dilemma in apprenticeship is ungrounded.
- What are the differences between fast food and traditional food 89
- The pie chart shows the percentage of persons arrested in the five years ending in 1994 and the bar chart shows the most recent reasons for arrest 78
- The chart shows UK immigration emigration and net migration between 1999 and 2008 78
- The diagrams below present the estimates and projections of world population from the US Census Bureau 66
- What are the differences between fast food and traditional food 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 221, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...strike a balance between work and rest. Similarly important is that, without the presence...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...nts on the way to the office. Some may argue that integrating homeworking in one’s b...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, similarly, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50171821306 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11440324359 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632302405498 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1195585449 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0625 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1875 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4375 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277761640887 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712982158404 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813226173864 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130496833556 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784974008067 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.