The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectoures in Canada
in 2005 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make
comparisons where relevant.
The charts illustrate the comparison of four retail sectors in Canada in term of the percentage of internet sales in two years, 2005 and 2010.
Overall, it is clear that there was a significant change in the proportion of online sales for each sector during 2005 and 2010. The figures for food and beverage and video games increased considerably, whereas this number in the other sections decreased.
In 2010, the percentage of online sales of food and beverage rose by 10 percent from 2005 figure of 22%. Besides, video games also saw a growth in the figure for internet sales. While this proportion was 18% in 2005, then it went up to 23% after a 10-year period.
By contrast, the most dramatic decline in the amount of online sales of home furnishings when it fell from 25% down to 15%, in 2005 and 2010 respectively. And there was a drop in that of electronics and appliance that witnessed a fall from 35% in 2005 to 30% in 2010.
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- the chart below shows long term international migration in UK 60
- the three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 73
- When designing a building the most important factor is intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Students should pay the full cost of their own university studies rather than have free higher education provided by the state 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 268, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a fall from 35% in 2005 to 30% in 2010.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 771.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58928571429 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55616473933 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553571428571 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.0237271543 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.375 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230120048904 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1034823506 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789661315365 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155785318411 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676637461248 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.