Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.
Some people believe that Universities should teach their students only the subjects of the field they have chosen. However, applying such a policy might restrict the knowledge of the student to their respective fields only. Focusing on one field is an important aspect for becoming an expert but it is also important to have a brief knowledge of another field apart from the one they have chosen. Hence, I believe that Universities should teach a variety of courses apart from the student's field of study.
Students of the 21st century not only need a thorough knowledge of their field of study but also need a basic understanding of other fields. Our current world asks for diverse knowledge and a diverse set of skills. By offering different courses to the students, Universities may train their students to handle various kinds of situations that they might face during their lives. Industries need students who possess profound knowledge of their field and also own rudimentary knowledge of other fields too. If a student studying Software Engineering possesses a keen knowledge of web development. However, full-stack developers require to work in a team and should possess effective communication skills in order to develop a user-friendly website. So, it is important that they study subjects related to communication with the subjects of Software Engineering. One-dimensional courses may not prepare students to face real-life problems.
Every field is dependent on other fields. So, when students start jobs in various industries, they will work with people from different fields. Thus, students should own basic knowledge of other fields in order to understand the jargon of different people in various fields. If a student chooses a job in a Mobile production company as a VLSI Engineer, he might work with people from the IT department. In order to design a VLSI chip that fulfills all the requirements, they must understand the jargon of IT engineering. Therefore, it becomes essential for a student to own rudimentary knowledge of IT engineering. Thus, if a University encourages students to study different courses of fields apart from their field, students may apply the knowledge gained from these courses in real life.
In conclusion, I disagree that Universities should require students to study courses only within their field. Because when students study the courses of their chosen field along with the courses of other fields their breadth of knowledge becomes wider. Hence, the probability of becoming a successful person in today's world will increase by having a wide knowledge of various fields. Overall, it is best for Universities to allow students to choose courses outside of their chosen field in order to diversify their knowledge and skill set.
- The leaders or directors of organizations are older people But some people say that young people can be leaders At what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Claim In any profession business politics education government those in power should step down after five years Reason The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent 66
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but by the general welfare of its people 50
- The chart below gives information about adults with education at high school level in six countries in 2010 67
- some people believe that climate has the greatest effect on people s life Others believe the economy of the region has the greatest effect 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 507, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...imentary knowledge of other fields too. If a student studying Software Engineering...
^^
Line 3, column 636, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'working'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: working
... However, full-stack developers require to work in a team and should possess effective ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 740, Rule ID: WEB_SITE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'website'?
Suggestion: website
...lls in order to develop a user-friendly web site. So, it is important that they study su...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 111, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... study courses only within their field. Because when students study the courses of thei...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 167, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to field'
Suggestion: to field
...dents study the courses of their chosen field along with the courses of other fields ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 482, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to field'
Suggestion: to field
... choose courses outside of their chosen field in order to diversify their knowledge a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, apart from, in conclusion, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 19.5258426966 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2339.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 446.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24439461883 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83110706372 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.410313901345 0.4932671777 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 701.1 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.317540755 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.695652174 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3913043478 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04347826087 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.83258426966 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416054490686 0.243740707755 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149032420377 0.0831039109588 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117554173718 0.0758088955206 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294477063406 0.150359130593 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417782491764 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.