Since the technology has already paved its way into every aspect of our life, substantial proportion of people now opt for calling or video calling rather than writing letter as people were accustomed to doing in the past. On a personal level, I claim that the development of technological devices and smart utilities gave rise to this trend, and it has areal positive impact for the future life.
To begin with, the leading reason why people avoid to write letters now is the willingness to consume the time. By simply taking advantages of the convenience of e-mails or any other social applications, for the time being individuals can make decisions in the last minutes, without enduring hours or days waiting for an appropriate reply. Respectively, while the transportation and tourism industry are developing at an accelerating rate, a number of people are able to travel all over the world. For this purpose, people have no necessity to write continuous letters in order to keep strong relationship with each other.
Consequently, this trend has a positive and vital effects for future generations. First of all, it triggers to the time management. It is more helpful and convenient to call someone or just typing message rather than writing letters in a traditional way. Additionally, one can easily decide on something and deal with his problems in a faster way by exchanging his ideas with another person through meeting face to face.
To sum up, society's preference about not write letters can be flawed from technological development and it has a positive effect for the future life.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: Ahmad1103
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l positive impact for the future life. To begin with, the leading reason why pe...
^^^
Line 2, column 49, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'avoid writing'.
Suggestion: avoid writing
...gin with, the leading reason why people avoid to write letters now is the willingness to consu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ply taking advantages of the convenience of e-mails or any other social applicati...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... strong relationship with each other. Consequently, this trend has a positive ...
^^
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a traditional way" with adverb for "traditional"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ing message rather than writing letters in a traditional way. Additionally, one can easily decide on...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... person through meeting face to face. To sum up, societys preference about not...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...positive effect for the future life.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, so, while, first of all, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1337.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06439393939 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88597338887 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640151515152 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8583576311 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.545454545 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177618706961 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683681141818 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421555254224 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107518703479 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199701987603 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.