Meals have always played an important role in individuals’ lives, and people in different countries have distinctive types of cultures to have them. In this regard, some people believe that having regular family meals together is still significant for people, while I have enough reasons to object to this viewpoint. I will enlarge on what I mean in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, nowadays, people have to work very hard to make ends meet, so they do not have enough time to have meals with their families, even some of them cannot allocate enough time to eat their meals individually. To put it in a more vivid picture, countries face with different kinds of economic problems these days, which makes people work harder than the past in order to meet their supplies. As a result, people have to go to work from dawn till dusk so that they can earn enough money. Accordingly, they cannot spend their time with their families in order to eat their food together since they have to be at their work places more than ever. As a way of illustration, take my country. In my country, the fluctuation rate is increasing day after day, which means everything prices are increasing rapidly. The more fluctuate rate is, the more people have to work to earn enough money. So, they do not have any time to assign to eat their meals with their families regularly.
Secondly, exponentially growing internet modifies people’s cultures, so they do not tend to eat their food together these days. To clarify this point, there are a number of appliances produced in different countries with which people can have a considerable amount of information from faraway places. Due to this fact, people’s cultures have changed, and it makes them turn their back to the older traditions. One of these traditions was about eating courses with families. Take my previous example, for illustration. Nowadays, people, especially youngsters, do not want to have their meals with their loved ones because most of them try to post their pictures which are taken from different restaurants on their social media accounts. This means juvenile members of society do not pay enough attention to spend their time with their families, and this logic is true about having meals with them.
To sum up, all things considered, I strongly believe that people do not pay heed to have main courses together. This is due to the fact that, not only do people not have enough time to allocate to that process, but also they tend to turn their back to the older traditions.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 78
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parent s jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parent s job 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is the best way for teachers to help students become more interested in a subject by explaining how this subject can help students live better outside of the school 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, even so, i mean, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2114.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 435.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85977011494 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55904097508 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475862068966 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 644.4 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0813291092 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.7 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23885917292 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861306431666 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787533366079 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188034306658 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106110763451 0.0645574589148 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.