Donating money to charities has always been a significant matter in every society since there are usually a number of families who need this money to meet their supplies. In this regard, some people believe that individuals who have more money should not donate much money than others because all people should help charities as the same. As far as I am concerned, I have enough reasons to object to that point of view. I will enlarge on what I mean in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, should people who have more money donate more money to charities than others, they will not feel a considerable amount of pressure. To put it in a more vivid picture, the pressure people will feel when they give money to charities is inextricably linked to how much money they have in their bank account. That is due to the fact that, it will be too difficult for those who do not have enough money to meet their needs to present money to charities. Whereas individuals who are really wealthy can bestow a great deal of money to these kinds of organization as easily as possible. In addition, they will be free of any side effect of that donating since they have a vast amount of money with which they can do whatever they want.
Secondly, the more money a person has, the more responsibilities he or she has because these kinds of people are a fantastic motivation for others. In other words, people who have much money should act as a role model for others in societies, especially for youngsters who are more susceptible to these types of subjects. As a result, donating more money by those who are wealthy can motivate others to pay for these sorts of organizations, so the more money charities can obtain, the more people they can help. Cristiano Ronaldo is a compelling example of that. Juvenile members of every society make a model of him and tend to pass a way which he passed. Furthermore, he always bestows a lot of money to different charities in order to help poor people. As a result, revenue of charities has increased exponentially more than what Cristiano donates to them.
To sum up, all things considered, I firmly believe that people who have more money should donate to charities more than others. Given that, not only do they feel almost no pressure because of donating, but also they are role models of their communities.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents today are more involved in their children s education than parents were in the past 70
- Students of a university have a long break between university semesters the university requires all students to do one of the following for one month during the break 1 Students must take a course on the subject that has no direct connection to their majo 75
- Governments need to spend money on beautiful things more than on practical things 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important ways to improve the people s health is to clean the environment 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 71
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, really, second, secondly, so, whereas, i mean, in addition, as a result, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1933.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6578313253 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58970123276 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450602409639 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 628.2 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8188800681 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.388888889 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0555555556 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38888888889 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303226327309 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108765793765 0.076458572812 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815416542818 0.0737576698707 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204258809729 0.150856017488 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421931756167 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, really, second, secondly, so, whereas, i mean, in addition, as a result, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1933.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6578313253 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58970123276 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450602409639 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 628.2 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8188800681 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.388888889 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0555555556 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38888888889 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303226327309 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108765793765 0.076458572812 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815416542818 0.0737576698707 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204258809729 0.150856017488 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421931756167 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.