Nowadays, technology use has become the norm in various fields and education is not an exception. Used technology applications in teaching bring a number of significant benefits for learners and improve the quality of lecture. However, I disagree with the statement that technology will totally substitute the teacher’s role in the classroom.
Firstly, the teacher has the ability to adjust their syllabus to match their student’s capacity. In fact, the teacher will be able to combine easy lessons or separate the lecture structure in flexibility if their students are struggling to understand. However, this is beyond the proficiency of a computerized teacher, which is running and operating based on the preprogrammed setting. In view of that, technology will not displace the role of the teacher in the classroom.
Moreover, there are some conflicts and discrimination existed in the education environment especially classroom must be dealt with in harmony and not affected the students' emotion as well as self-esteem, whose a computerized teacher can’t solve as it don’t have ability to understand the feeling so as the teacher. This is of crucial importance when it comes to teaching children. A technology-based teacher can neither feel children’s sentiment when they have trouble in their life nor find out the solution to improve the situation immediately. Accordingly, the teacher is the key characteristic of the classroom.
In short, although technology has a great contribution in the benefit of in-class learning. It is lacking the ability to cater the student’s needs as well as assisting them towards success. Instead, it should be support for teachers and prodigious resources of information. Therefore, it is absolutely that technology will never supersede the teacher's mission in education field
- Some people believe that technology has led to many positive developments in their lives while others think technology is gradually taking over control of the way people live Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- The presence of technology in the classroom has become more and more apparent and offers students tremendous resources with which to supplement their education Given time technology will completely replace the traditional teacher in the classroom Do you 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...lt with in harmony and not affected the students emotion as well as self-esteem, whose a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: WHOSE_DT[5]
Message: Did you mean 'who's'?
Suggestion: who's
...tudents emotion as well as self-esteem, whose a computerized teacher can’t solve as i...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 213, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'supported'?
Suggestion: supported
... towards success. Instead, it should be support for teachers and prodigious resources o...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 344, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...hat technology will never supersede the teachers mission in education field
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, in fact, in short, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54804270463 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22811699793 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569395017794 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7459064149 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.933333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30497306766 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105145479904 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653106570501 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1889206965 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304979806201 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.