Youths are often called up for working for the development of communities. Some people say that they should work voluntarily, whereas others say that they should get paid. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Volunteering is the way to giving back to society. While some people opine that youngsters should indulge in social works, other say that they should be paid for their work. This essay will not discuss these divergent views rationally, but my opinion will also be highlighted while concluding it.
To commence with, there are some reasons why some people say voluntary work done by youngsters should be paid. At the top of that is due to materialistic desires. To be precise, nowadays every individual needs some money to fulfil their desires ranging from clothes to electronic gadgets. As some adolescents have not received enough pocket money from their parents. For instance, if they do paid voluntarily work, perhaps they will be able to purchase those things. Furthermore, it will not only help them to earn some money but it also is beneficial to the community. To epitome, indulging in unpaid work will reduce crime rates. In a recent survey conducted by the crime branch of India, people who do voluntary work have higher self-esteem and do not engage in any unlawful activities. Not only this, but they also encourage other youth to indulge in these pursuits.
On the other hand, those who say teenagers should work voluntarily. Firstly, they get to know about society and what is the present condition of our country because news channels do not show the truth on national television. At the same time, it gives them a sense of purpose and satisfaction. Secondly, it allows meeting people outside their circle. Moreover, when they do unpaid Labour and help needy people. They receive many blessings which have a positive impact on their future. Lastly, it will not only help them to know about society but also improve their way of thinking and problem-solving techniques.
To conclude, in my opinion, paying the youth for voluntarily work is not necessary. Although they do not get any money for their work, it will bring lots of benefits for them.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-09-28 | dlizn | view | |
2021-03-07 | Manvir singh | 78 | view |
2021-03-07 | Manvir singh | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide co2 emissions per person in the united kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 78
- The table and notes below give information about student enrolment at Brighton co ed secondary school in 1990 2000 and 2010
- The table shows the percentage of spending in five countries in three product groups 92
- Youths are often called up for working for the development of communities Some people say that they should work voluntarily whereas others say that they should get paid Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The bar chart shows the number of girls per 100 boys enrolled in different levels of school education 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ing from clothes to electronic gadgets. As some adolescents have not received enou...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96666666667 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61892701236 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1538252892 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0476190476 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7142857143 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52380952381 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36829087293 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106643248784 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110462106852 0.0667982634062 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256395362911 0.151304729494 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639248393822 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.