The graph bellow shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The following graph depicts how many tourists made a visit of a specific Caribbean island during 2010 till 2017.
As can be clearly observed from the graph, there are two distinctive types of visitors including the visitors who stayed on the island and the visitors who stayed on cruise ships. Unlike the year of 2012 which the number of cruise ships’ stayers experienced a dramatic decrease in comparison with 2011 and reached near 200000, there was a sharp climb between 2013 to 2017 from around 200000 visitors to about 2 million of tourists.
In addition, from 2010 till 2011 the number of visitors who preferred to stay on the island remained fixed approximately 700000 of visitors. Whereas the island-stayers went up significantly from around 0.7 million to 1.5 million between 2011 until 2013, throughout the following three years, this kind of visitors’ number maintained its stability. It witnessed a slight decline in 2016 to around 1.2 million visitors, however it touched the previous peak again which was 1.5 million.
It is clear from the graph that the total number of tourists rose drastically from about one million of visitors in 2010 to 3.5 million in 2017. Despite the other two types, the sum of tourists had almost a monotone increase during all eight years of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-08 | RIYA MODI | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | dhphuc7866 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | rumpul4skin | view | |
| 2023-08-15 | nguyenanh9182 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | NgoMinhTriet | 84 | view |
- Which areas of concern should governments allocate funds to Climate change education or public health Explain your idea with examples 85
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of anthropologists in work after five years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the m 56
- University experience is more important than a university s degree Some people argue that university life is much more important than an educational degree in job market Do you agree or not agree 88
- Medical technology can increase life expectancy Is it a blessing or curse 88
- Poor lifestyles have a negative impact on people s health List some unhealthy lifestyles and discuss what government services could help 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, in addition, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1087.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00921658986 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61141953503 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585253456221 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.7438520459 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.875 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.125 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168417070591 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857016235307 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707890761729 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13071675052 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663482270779 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.