Some people believe that exploring outer space is important because it expands human knowledge and might lead to discoveries that will benefit humanity in the future. Other people believe that space exploration is a waste of money that could be better spent solving immediate problems here on Earth.
Choose which position you most agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading.
Recently, the phenomenon of "some people believe that exploring outer space is important, but other people believe that space exploration is a waste of money " and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that solving immediate problems on the Earth might be remakably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remakable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that space exploration can be plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the technology standpoint, exploring outer space can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that expanding human knowledge and new discoveries are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the effects of new discoveries on the human's life. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both finding new planets and inventing new shuttles distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of climate science, without the slightest doubt, spending money for exploring outer space might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of climate change. Moreover, fundametal aspects of global warming can relate to the reality that the demerits of the lack of budgets can pertain to spending money on space travel. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of the absence of attention to sea-level rising were correlated positively with increasing federal budgets, the local authorities would ultimately address melting icebergs. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of the environment problems.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of exploring outer space far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-25 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | kbalavenka | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Maheswari | 77 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Maheswari | 77 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Maheswari | 77 | view |
- A good listener is better than a good talker in a social situation Do you agree or disagree 80
- There are more negative impacts than benefits of people using mobile devices Do you agree 88
- People should take part in sports either in individual or in teams because people can learn many useful skills How far do you agree Explain and use examples or your own experience 85
- Governments should not put too much attention on arts such as theaters Governments should allocate more funds to areas of concern Do you agree with this opinion or not Use your own experience to support your idea 83
- the chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 366, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...d the effects of new discoveries on the humans life. Thus, invaluable ramifications of...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69624573379 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07372324404 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 139.433497537 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627986348123 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.8940777727 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.727272727 104.977214359 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6363636364 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373952740015 0.242375264174 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11556496361 0.0925447433944 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107928221531 0.071462118173 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187976555855 0.151781067708 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109482890101 0.0609392437508 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 12.6369458128 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.12 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 55.0591133005 209% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.