Works of literature is a waste of time for students today. Do you agree and use your own experience.
Recently, the phenomenon of "works of literature is a waste of time for students today" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that literature might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that literature for students can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the cultural standpoint, works of literature can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that increasing the awareness of students and being familiar with the history of the world are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of literature for students. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both learning how to write poems and reading works of literature distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of education science, without the slightest doubt, the lack of works of literature might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of wasting time by students. Moreover, fundamental aspects of literature can relate to the reality that the demerits of the absence of knowledge can pertain to the motivation of students. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of working on literature were correlated positively with degree courses, the local authorities would ultimately address publication issues. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of the students' attitude.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of works of literature for students far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-05 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 80 | view |
| 2021-01-29 | honorrr | 88 | view |
| 2020-12-02 | Behnaz fallah | 88 | view |
| 2020-08-31 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2020-06-06 | batravision27 | 78 | view |
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people think human behaviors can be limited by laws others think laws have little effect What is your opinion 77
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists traveling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia s share of the Japanese tourist market Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- The information revolution by modern mass media has both positive and negative consequences for individuals and for society To what extent do you agree 88
- Many universities offer degree courses in popular culture such as popular music and video gaming Do you think it is appropriate and give reasons to support your idea 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 670, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...to infer the preconceived notion of the students attitude. To conclude, despite sever...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66901408451 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22972365043 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598591549296 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.4461090408 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.363636364 104.977214359 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8181818182 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279931452254 0.242375264174 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104877618628 0.0925447433944 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665913875607 0.071462118173 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167784937321 0.151781067708 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348388583419 0.0609392437508 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 12.6369458128 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.