There are both problems and benefits for high school students to study plays and works of theatres written centuries ago. Discuss and use your own experience.
Recently the phenomenon of studying theatres written centuries ago and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although cantested by many that the matter of high school students is highly beneficial, such issue is regarding thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that teaching plays of old theaters can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, educating plays of old theaters written can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of colleges as well as the curriculum are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment which discovered to study an old subject. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both teachers and principles apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the high school theaters' timetables might increase the consequences of the background of theaters. Moreover, The fundamental aspects of undergraduates could relate to this reality that the demerits of decades ago pertain to the educational information. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted the downside of graduates is correlated negatively with perfect knowledge. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of different attitudes.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of learning about the ancient theaters far outweigh its drawbacks.
Language
- Some languages are increasingly spoken in different countries while the usage of others is rapidly declining Is this a positive or a negative development 85
- In the cashless society people use more credit cards What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon 88
- It is often argued that studying overseas is overrated There are many scholars who study locally To what extend do you agree that this can effect a quality education 88
- There are both problems and benefits for high school students to study plays and works of theatres written centuries ago Discuss and use your own experience 80
- Schools should prepare students for university rather than for work To what extent do you agree with this statement 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 243.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64197530864 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19164390205 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650205761317 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9635461312 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.636363636 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0909090909 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2186245771 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648206668096 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567476801724 0.071462118173 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11030643895 0.151781067708 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704979856801 0.0609392437508 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.97 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.