The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph below illustrates the data about the average amount of carbon dioxide emissions per person in the four countries, including the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal, from 1967 to 2007. In general, Britain is the country where the amount of carbon dioxide emitted per person accounted for the largest proportion.
It could be easily observed from the line chart that the emission of carbon dioxide in the UK significantly decreased during the period 1967-2007, from approximately 11 to nearly 9 metric tonnes. About Sweden, in the first 10 years, the rate considerably increased to 10 metric tonnes in 1977 before experiencing a remarkable fall by almost 3 tonnes in 1987. From 1987 on, this trend continued and therefore resulted in the variation of positions.
In comparison with the figures of the amount of carbon dioxide discharged by UK and Sweden, that of Italy and Portugal were completely different. Both Italy and Portugal had a regular increased and both reached its peak in 2007 with roughly 8 tonnes and 6 tonnes, respectively.
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 73
- The chart below shows the average hours worked per day by married men and women in paid employment Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities 78
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002
- The chart below shows the percentage of people accessing news via different media in one country in 2013 2015 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph below illustrates the data about the av...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...lted in the variation of positions. In comparison with the figures of the amount of carbo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, therefore, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11494252874 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81470761189 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609195402299 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.003222205 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.142857143 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28767768372 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1237928403 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106130125535 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191583575386 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107238678892 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.