Pie chart
The given pie charts compare how much water was consumed for different purposes between 1007 and 2007.
Overall, it is apparent that the amount of water used for all the sectors, except for service industry and domestic use, witnessed a slight reduction after 10 years. It is also evident that the water consumption for food industry occupied the lion’s share of the pie while the proportion for building industry held a rather miniscule one.
Looking at the details, nearly half of the pie demonstrating water consumption in 1997 was allotted to food industry before experiencing a slight fall to 41% in 2007. Similarly, the figure for manufacturing underwent a negligible decrease over the ten-year period, from 15% to 11%. The proportion for building industry seemed to stay stable throughout the years with the percentage was next to none.
In contrast, the amount of water dedicated to service industry witnessed a twofold increase, from 13% in 1997 to roughly a quarter of the 2007 pie. The figure for domestic consumption also inched by 3% to 21% in the latter year.
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among people in society Do you think the advantage outweighs the disadvantage 89
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Pie chart 78
- Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport while other people think that mental strengths are more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The diagram below give information about two road tunnels in one Australian city 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, similarly, so, while, except for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09497206704 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73503486584 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575418994413 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3590694396 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148332342686 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690037717696 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873912409525 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115022859168 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0895960317346 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.