The given maps illustrate two different underground tunnel systems in an Australian city.
Overall, it can clearly be seen that there are a number of differences between the two systems, in terms of size, length, cost and time of construction, capacity and the surrounding environment. Another interesting point is that despite lower construction price, Tunnel A took longer time to install but has smaller vehicle capayin comparison with Tunnel B.
It took 5 years (from 1987 to 1992) to build the first tunnel system, which is 25 meters in height and 2.2km in length, while the construction of Tunnel B lasted 2 years shorter with the corresponding size and length being 3.5 meters and 3.6 kn respectively. The price for installation experience the same pattern when expenditure on constructing the latter system was over one billion dollars, twofold higher than that of the former one
Owing to the larger size, the vehicle capacity of the second underground road system consist of six lanes for cars and trucks whereas the first tunnel is four lanes wide. While Tunnel B was a normal underground system, Tunnel A was built underneath a body of water, stone and sand
- Pie chart 78
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks why and what can be done to reduce sugary drinks consumption 89
- The table below shows the water usage for different purposes in six different countries in 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table below shows the water usage for different purposes in six different countries in 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below give information about two road tunnels in one Australian city 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04615384615 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81103302015 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635897435897 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.5184648861 43.030603864 208% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 164.0 112.824112599 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5 22.9334400587 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157798039572 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826572914499 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392169579507 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103966430484 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328406240125 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.