The diagram below give information about two road tunnels in one Australian city.
Given is the diagram illustrating the data of tunnels system in a city in Australia.
It is clear from the diagram that each has its own perks when being built. Remarkably, tunnel A is dwarfed by tunnel B in terms of cost.
To embark on, tunnel A was made earlier which was before the appearance of tunnel B 15 years and took 5 years to accomplish. In terms of the usage, tunnel A is used to offer people a chance to travel under the bridge, while tunnel B aims at reducing the volume and speed of traffic. A notable fact is that tunnel B costs an arm and leg, at $1.1 billion, which is significantly higher than $556 million of tunnel A; however, in tunnel B, it expands both height and depth perspectives with 35 meters high and 3,6 kilometres.
By and large, both road tunnels have two tubes that connect at both ends and allow different genres of transport such as a car, bus, truck and so on.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-21 | Judie6203 | 89 | view |
| 2020-11-11 | Lich Thi Thanh Tran | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-24 | Hira Shaheen | 79 | view |
- The bar graph below shows the number of television receivers per 1000 inhabitants in the world in 1970 and 1997 85
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry. 84
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995 81
- The chart below shows average hours and minutes spent by UK males and females on different daily activities. 84
- The best way to increase employees' job satisfaction is to increase their salaries. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, such as, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 736.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.3550295858 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46331581259 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633136094675 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 213.3 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1470372853 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.142857143 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188251603359 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906325542932 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.026284068695 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116352772282 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0062148699117 0.0819641961636 8% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.3 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.