It is often argued that parents should be in charge of commuting their children to school, while others disagree and believe that it is the government’s duty. Personally, from my point of view in spite of parental responsibilities to ensure the well-being and safety of their offspring, authority ought to assist with commuting to education places out of necessity.
It is clear that parents are directly responsible for the security of their children. For this reason, being with children during a trip to school may diminish the risk of falling victims to crimes such as abduction or coming under the negative influence of peer pressure. This is because children are by far vulnerable without parental support. Furthermore, it appears that transportation by parents helps to avoid truancy. In other words, no matter how well-brought-up children are, youth could behave differently amongst classmates. In addition, it seems that conveying to school is essential for bonding. It would mean that both relatives may enhance their family tie before a hectic workday when they both are still energetic.
However, many hold the view that governments are obligated to guarantee to commute to school. Firstly, many schools are public. It means that public money must be allocated and taxpayers may count on government support. This is an important particular for families who live in far-flung areas from school. Secondly. Lack of private cars in many families may give rise to limiting off education completely. Moreover, the situation can be aggravated if families are not only dual-income but also, have several children of different ages. To put it another way, conveying children to school may appear to become a real challenge. Therefore, the government should make a commitment to provide proper transportation for young students to school, while parents may or may not use it at their own judgment.
In conclusion, while people’s opinion differs widely in relation to the issue of children transfer to school, in my opinion, the government ought to be under the obligation of providing safe conveyance pupils. However, parents whose ability allows them to do this by themselves would only win this because it may eliminate the probability to become a victim of kidnapping and would strengthen family ties.
- Today single use products are still very common What are the problems associated with this What are some possible solutions 89
- Some educationalists say that every child should be taught how to play a musical instrument To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The natural resources such as oil forests and fresh water are being consumed at an alarming rate What problems does it cause How can we solve these problems 63
- In many places new homes are needed but the only space available for building them is in the countryside Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there What is your opinion about this 89
- Some people say it is important to keep your home and your workplace tidy with everything organized and in the correct place What is your opinion about this 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
...hey both are still energetic. However, many hold the view that governments are obligated...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in other words, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1945.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27100271003 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92825419494 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579945799458 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2829854663 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.368421053 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4210526316 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8421052632 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323046029712 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0979424686763 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756031656631 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196621331391 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474311124397 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.