The reading passage and lecture talk about type of fungus called Phytophthora, which detected in forest of USA, these fungus infects trees and cause serious damage to oak trees. The author claims three methods to protect the forests. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article, she says all these methods to save oak trees are impractical.
First, the writer states, stope spreading of spores by washing hikers shoes or scrubbing bicycle. This point contradict by professor, she mention, washing shoes and scrubbing may decrease the spread of spores but not in amount that can decrease the infection with this fungus, because these spores spread by stream of water after the rain fell, it go far distance, therefore cleaning of bicycle or shoes dose not solve the problem.
Second, the author argues, using fungicidal can kill these species and prevent spreading of it to the surrounding area. This argument is reputed by professor, she states that fungicidal can stop the effect of fugus only few month, in addition we need to inject these chemicals directly in the stump of trees, this is may be can be effective with limited amount of trees in the city, but it is more difficult to inject a thousand and thousand trees in the forest.
Finally, the author, posts, clear-cutting of the area with infected trees can to burn the trees with the fungus and decrease the disease. The lecturer in the other hand refutes this suggestion, she illustrates to, burning infected trees can also burn healthy trees in the forest, moreover there are very rare trees in the forest that can burn and never grow again, hence burning diseased trees is impractical method to prevent spread of disease.
The reading passage and lecture talk about type of fungus called Phytophthora, which detected in forest of USA, these fungus infects trees and cause serious damage to oak trees. The author claims three methods to protect the forests. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article, she says all these methods to save oak trees are impractical.
First, the writer states, stope spreading of spores by washing hikers shoes or scrubbing bicycle. This point contradict by professor, she mention, washing shoes and scrubbing may decrease the spread of spores but not in amount that can decrease the infection with this fungus, because these spores spread by stream of water after the rain fell, it go far distance, therefore cleaning of bicycle or shoes dose not solve the problem.
Second, the author argues, using fungicidal can kill these species and prevent spreading of it to the surrounding area. This argument is reputed by professor, she states that fungicidal can stop the effect of fugus only few month, in addition we need to inject these chemicals directly in the stump of trees, this is may be can be effective with limited amount of trees in the city, but it is more difficult to inject a thousand and thousand trees in the forest.
Finally, the author, posts, clear-cutting of the area with infected trees can to burn the trees with the fungus and decrease the disease. The lecturer in the other hand refutes this suggestion, she illustrates to, burning infected trees can also burn healthy trees in the forest, moreover there are very rare trees in the forest that can burn and never grow again, hence burning diseased trees is impractical method to prevent spread of disease.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-23 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
- The readind passage and the lecture are both discussing genetic modification process to creat more trees and vegetables The writer claims three benefits from applying this process The lecturer contradicts each benefit which is given by articls First the a 65
- The passage and lecture are both talking about declination of cedar population in North America The author claims several reason to explain causes of this declination the lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article He states these reasons are inadequed 60
- The passage and lecture are both disscusing uses of great house of Chaco canyon settelments The writer claims three possible uses of these houses The lecture casts doubt on claim made in the article He says these suggestive uses are unsupportive First the 70
- The passing and lecturer are both about the ability of Pterosaurs of power flight The author claims Pterosaurs cannot power flight and he supports his claim by giving three evidences The lecturer casts doubt on the claim made in article She says no one of 60
- The reading passage and the lecture disccuses how to prevent birds from injury by hitting in building made of glass material The writer claims several solution for this problem However the lecturer casts dout on claim made in article He suggests non solut 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this fungus' or 'these fungi', 'these funguses'?
Suggestion: this fungus; these fungi; these funguses
...thora, which detected in forest of USA, these fungus infects trees and cause serious damage ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s three methods to protect the forests. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in a...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ods to save oak trees are impractical. First, the writer states, stope spreadin...
^^^
Line 2, column 112, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'contradicts'.
Suggestion: contradicts
... shoes or scrubbing bicycle. This point contradict by professor, she mention, washing shoe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 141, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'mentions'.
Suggestion: mentions
...This point contradict by professor, she mention, washing shoes and scrubbing may decrea...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun month seems to be countable; consider using: 'few months'.
Suggestion: few months
...cidal can stop the effect of fugus only few month, in addition we need to inject these ch...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...more difficult to inject a thousand and thousand trees in the forest. Finally, the au...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sand and thousand trees in the forest. Finally, the author, posts, clear-cuttin...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l method to prevent spread of disease.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 285.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95789473684 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42088990046 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543859649123 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 21.2450331126 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 104.409568645 49.2860985944 212% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 157.0 110.228320801 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6666666667 21.698381199 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06452816374 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.429103177343 0.272083759551 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.200661799003 0.0996497079465 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.218334949213 0.0662205650399 330% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.293074623909 0.162205337803 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.306277883993 0.0443174109184 691% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.3589403974 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 53.8541721854 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.498013245 137% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.