The passing and lecturer are both about the ability of Pterosaurs of power flight The author claims Pterosaurs cannot power flight and he supports his claim by giving three evidences The lecturer casts doubt on the claim made in article She says no one of

Essay topics:

The passing and lecturer are both about the ability of Pterosaurs of power flight. The author claims, Pterosaurs cannot power flight and he supports his claim by giving three evidences. The lecturer casts doubt on the claim made in article. She says, no one of these evidences is correct.
First, the author states, Pterosaurs are cooled blood and have low metabolic rate, since they do not have enough energy to power flight. This point challenged by professor, She mentions, Pterosaurs have a thick hair cover their body like fur which covers the warm blood animals, hence these animal can keep their body warm in extreme cold weather, therefore they can provide enough energy to flight.
Second, the writer believes Pterosaurs have a heavy body which cannot enable them to flight because power flight need light weight. The lecture contradicts this argument, she claims, body of Pterosaurs has especial category which have bones with hallow in side and not compact, therefore they have a light bone compare to large size which enable them to flight.
Finally, the passage mentions, large size Pterosaurs cannot take off from ground like birds because they do not have strong muscles in their back legs. The lecturer in the other hand says, Pterosaurs walk on four legs instead of two like birds, hence these four legs can help them to run and take off from ground.

The passing and lecturer are both about the ability of Pterosaurs of power flight. The author claims, Pterosaurs cannot power flight and he supports his claim by giving three evidences. The lecturer casts doubt on the claim made in article. She says, no one of these evidences is correct.
First, the author states, Pterosaurs are cooled blood and have low metabolic rate, since they do not have enough energy to power flight. This point challenged by professor, She mentions, Pterosaurs have a thick hair cover their body like fur which covers the warm blood animals, hence these animal can keep their body warm in extreme cold weather, therefore they can provide enough energy to flight.
Second, the writer believes Pterosaurs have a heavy body which cannot enable them to flight because power flight need light weight. The lecture contradicts this argument, she claims, body of Pterosaurs has especial category which have bones with hallow in side and not compact, therefore they have a light bone compare to large size which enable them to flight.
Finally, the passage mentions, large size Pterosaurs cannot take off from ground like birds because they do not have strong muscles in their back legs. The lecturer in the other hand says, Pterosaurs walk on four legs instead of two like birds, hence these four legs can help them to run and take off from ground.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-02-21 talelaldabous 60 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user talelaldabous :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ts his claim by giving three evidences. The lecturer casts doubt on the claim made ...
^^^
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: LIGHT_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lightweight'?
Suggestion: lightweight
...hem to flight because power flight need light weight. The lecture contradicts this argument,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arge size which enable them to flight. Finally, the passage mentions, large siz...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, second, so, therefore

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1143.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 230.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96956521739 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20278651508 2.5805825403 85% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547826086957 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.4187473534 49.2860985944 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.3 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 7.06452816374 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396824938846 0.272083759551 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.211209544507 0.0996497079465 212% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.174834072526 0.0662205650399 264% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.293249739369 0.162205337803 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.309704326187 0.0443174109184 699% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 63.6247240618 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.