Students should pay the full cost for their own study, because university education benefits
individuals rather than society.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Somebody asserts that pupils are supposed to spend money on tuition themselves as higher education brings more advantages for individuals personally rather than socially. However, it is my belief that the government should be in charge of education fees for students for the positive impacts on both pupils and the community.
That students pay the full cost of their university education is supposed to reduce the learning opportunities of students, especially ones that have a great capacity but financial burden. If these students are sponsored by the government in terms of financial aids, they will be equipped with knowledge and skills which are obviously essential and pragmatic to the community. For instance, with the aim of meeting the demand of society, students being involved in fields like science, medicine, and education need to be trained intensively and extensively so that the funding from the government will be spent effectively for long-term purposes.
Another reason for government spending on education is financial situations that students may deal with when they graduate. It is undeniable that some poor pupils have to do part-time jobs after school and at the weekend in order to save money for the tuition loans. Consequently, these financial pressures tend to lessen their time and efforts on class performance which is undoubtedly worse during the time.
To conclude, I am against the opinion that students should pay for the education fees themselves. The government spending on tuition will not only benefit students individually but also socially for the long-term period.
- Subjects such as Art Sport and Music are being dropped from the school curriculum for subjects such as Information Technology Many children suffer as a result of these changes To what extent would you support or reject the idea of moving these subjects fr 84
- the table below gives information about the use of different modes of transport in Shanghai in 1996 and on possible projection high motorization scenario for their use in 2020 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing for example through cell phone tracking and security cameras In many cases the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening Do you think the advantages 84
- In the past when students did a university degree they tended to study in their own country Nowadays they have more opportunities to study abroad What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development You should use your own ideas knowledge and exp 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, may, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39682539683 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85802455531 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575396825397 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.7781607319 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24902591437 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106127120759 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607571218791 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160048150588 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479181299783 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, may, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39682539683 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85802455531 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575396825397 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.7781607319 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24902591437 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106127120759 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607571218791 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160048150588 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479181299783 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.