Some people think that government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view?
Human beings have thrived in the indulgence of gluttony over the last decades. While many people hold that authorities should have taken account of this predicament, others deem this unhealthy habit to be their accountability.
It is true to say that country leaders ought to help individuals be mindful of their diet. Because their citizens’ mind is frequently full of temptation from attractive advertisements. Therefore, not only do people need governments to deter their desire from profit-target companies, but they also need to live in a healthy environment. Additionally, to earn profit efficiently with minimum cost and expense, many take advantage of chemicals to produce cheap food in low quality. And thus, the government can investigate and arrest those lawbreakers in order to shield sustainable food markets for society with legal platform and punishments.
On the other hand, people certainly need to take into account of their eating habits. Even though one may living in a healthy environment with being aware of his daily consumption, he still has a risk of having health problems, such as obesity and high blood pressure. Moreover, gluttony is extremely contagious regarding crowd effect daily. For instance, parents addicted to junk foods could inherit that custom to their children in the future. However, a vegetarian or traditional restaurant has a ripple effect on the whole area surrounding, as they offer and nurture positive seeds in people’s life. Therefore, individuals’ will may play a significant role in creating a long life expectance for themselves and others.
In my perspective, people both require the equanimity between a strong will and a healthy environment maintained by a strict government in it to be healthy. Because I believe people’s consciousness is largely influenced by the collective energy from their community.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-09 | mindfulielts | 84 | view |
| 2020-07-28 | mindfulielts | 78 | view |
| 2020-07-20 | Tanveersingh97 | 73 | view |
| 2020-02-19 | Rabiak | 56 | view |
- the inequality between rich and poor nations 89
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Happiness is considered very important in life Why is it difficult to define What factors are important in achieving happiness 63
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in the Newyork city center from 2003 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people think that being able to communicate with others online is breaking down geographical barriers and enabling people who would normally never have the chance to meet to communicate What are the advantages of international communication online Ar 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...p individuals be mindful of their diet. Because their citizens’ mind is frequently full...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 158, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... strict government in it to be healthy. Because I believe people’s consciousness is lar...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for instance, such as, it is true, on the whole, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46735395189 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13326692571 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2536940425 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.066666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0666666667 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139143841642 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406392821047 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374288694864 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0885267827025 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030925381317 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.