Some people think that the best way to solve global environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, most of the pollutions on this planet result from traffic. While many deem the cost for traveling would solve this problem, I would hold that global issue is larger dimensions, including holistic human beings’ awareness to be resolved.
On the one hand, increasing the cost of traveling might solve a small fraction of the pollution, but it is only a tiny fraction of the matter. Because people still travel and consume nonstop daily. The fact that the electricity for our lightbulb is destroying hundreds of river and its ecology, the leathers for our glamorous dresses is killing thousands of animals, and the countless hectares of forest banks are eroding due to giant sand-sucking ships for so-called modern architectures. Therefore, it is clear to suggest our Mother Earth needs More efficient alternative plans. And thus, I oppose that increasing the cost of fuel is a profound approach to heal our Mother Nature in subtle dimensions.
On the other hand, I believe an alternative approach from within needs to considered profoundly. Promoting a higher price for energy consumption may urge people to work more and consume more than before. Nevertheless, living simply and be in harmony with nature would be more effective in the long run. Not only do human beings just aware that human beings are a piece of life from Mother Earth, but they realize themself as a source of creation. To simplify this, we are just specks of dust popping up and dropping down on this planet, but after being Her do we truly live a full-fledged life yet. By thinking about this question, individuals might be mindful of every action, whether they are creating happiness or suffering out of it.
In my opinion, a chaotic environment can not be created by the chaotic minds of the citizens living in it. the way out for this global issue hence might be from the inner mind.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-10 | mani223 | 78 | view |
| 2020-07-28 | mindfulielts | 78 | view |
| 2020-04-24 | annienguyen | 61 | view |
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- In the past when students did a university degree they tended to study in their own country Nowadays they have more opportunities to study abroad What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development You should use your own ideas knowledge and exp 78
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in the Newyork city center from 2003 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Sample topic When a country develops its technology the traditional skills and ways of life die out It is pointless to try and keep them alive To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 705, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...our Mother Nature in subtle dimensions. On the other hand, I believe an alternat...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, while, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93375394322 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67547315706 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589905362776 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8209837088 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.266666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1333333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106098208639 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0359898797289 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393821227962 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0652798460208 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224133290788 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.