Some people think that government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view?
Nowadays, art is a vast subject which plays a significant role in people’s life. While many people believe authority is investing unnecessary money on this, I would argue no matter where they capitalize, as long as there is a joyful life, there is art.
To begin with, I will redefine the meaning of art. Each individual has a different point of view about art, but beautiful art means goodness, truth, and beauty. For instance, when a city is projected or when a table is manufactured to inspire and motivate people in life, it is real art.
First of all, that is true to a certain extent that the government could waste their national budget if they subsidized for corrupted art. As it can be seen easily from the media, the art level of artist is diversified; and not everyone can create meaningful and profound works for people to enjoy life. Sometimes, people’s life suffers due to negative art. For example, after DC Film published the famous science fiction Bat Man movie, many people were statistically influenced by the villain Joker. As a result, they perform negative behavior in the community or even commit crimes. Authorities, thus, should have more awareness about the disposition of their financial budget for a better future.
On the other hand, the government could completely invest money for positive purposes elsewhere and harvest real art in life. Considering environment protection, as rulers conserve natural landscapes with decent finance, its beauty may inspire plenty of artistic and splendid pictures. Thus art and life are inter-are; this is because that is and that is because this is. There is life, so there is art and vice versa. As long as people keep watering the seed of happiness in the goodness, truth, and beauty, it will prosper in another form of artistic view.
In brief, while it is true that the government possibly put their money in the false purpose and it is wastage, I believe money can not be financed outside the cosmo to transform life as well as art. And the manifestation of art, besides its utility, depends on people’s awareness or their energy of mindfulness.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-09 | mindfulielts | 84 | view |
| 2020-07-28 | mindfulielts | 78 | view |
| 2020-07-20 | Tanveersingh97 | 73 | view |
| 2020-02-19 | Rabiak | 56 | view |
- Some people think that government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 84
- the table below gives information about the use of different modes of transport in Shanghai in 1996 and on possible projection high motorization scenario for their use in 2020 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 100
- Some people think that being able to communicate with others online is breaking down geographical barriers and enabling people who would normally never have the chance to meet to communicate What are the advantages of international communication online Ar 73
- Some people believe that it is the responsibility of individuals to take care of their own health and diet Others however believe that governments should make sure that their citizens have a healthy diet Discuss both views and give your opinion 80
- In the past when students did a university degree they tended to study in their own country Nowadays they have more opportunities to study abroad What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development You should use your own ideas knowledge and exp 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 287, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...enty of artistic and splendid pictures. Thus art and life are inter-are; this is bec...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, may, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in brief, as a result, as well as, first of all, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1778.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95264623955 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70436959106 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562674094708 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 2.10420841683 428% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2739814327 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7777777778 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9444444444 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61111111111 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272006366427 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827483670739 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566298933462 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156041225709 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372258193193 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.