Space travel is fantastic these days, but there are many issues, such as environmental problems that we should be focusing on. What are your views on the allocation of public funding?
Recently, the phenomenon of traveling to the space and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of environmental issues is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the space technological advances can be a plus and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a scial standpoint, traveling to other planets can provide the society with some noticable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of solar system and the air pollution are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered space rockets. Therefore, beneficial ramifications of public investments apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science allocating public funds to space travel can increase the consequenes of budget policies. Moreover, fundamental aspects of tax strategies could relate to this reality that the demerits of space studies pertain to financial issues. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of environmental degradation and space travelers are not negatively correlated. Hence, it is correct to presume preconceived notions of funding of public infrastructures.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of traveling to the space far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantage of governmental budget prove its significance, but also pinpoint its importance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-15 | vahidmetall | 85 | view |
| 2020-12-02 | Basil3241 | 75 | view |
| 2020-08-21 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2020-06-30 | Gohar Khan | 72 | view |
| 2020-05-19 | Behnaz fallah | 85 | view |
- There are both advantages and disadvantages of company workers accessing their own products and services Discuss 58
- Medical technology can increase life expectancy Is it a blessing or curse 88
- Fuzzy Agent based model framework for BIM Adoption for Facility Management in the New Zealand Construction Industry from Stakeholders Collaboration Perspective 61
- While artificial intelligence becomes so advanced people can use computers to translate foreign languages Do you agree with it Give examples or your experiences to support 77
- Parents should be held legally responsible for their children s acts What is your opinion Support it with personal examples 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64566929134 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33303468602 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645669291339 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0413156576 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221404991915 0.242375264174 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733086086499 0.0925447433944 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506014439086 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117794296388 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064934335217 0.0609392437508 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.89 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.