Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings. Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land. Which approach is better in your opinion and why?
It is quite common these days for the authorities in different nations to decide the location and features when creating a residential region. Nevertheless, whether building taller apartments or individual houses has caused a heated debate. I tend to concur with the view of setting up a housing area with tall buildings for several reasons in the following essay.
Chiefly, the rapidly increasing population in cities has created problems like congested housing areas while living in residential societies. Thus, building a sky-scraping apartment is better than an individual house as both covers the same size of land. Because taller buildings will provide multi-story apartments with extra rooms for residents. Besides, If we build a private big house on the residential land, only one family can live in that house. However, creating residential societies with taller buildings can reside multiple families. Therefore, it is one of the most effective ways to construct housing areas for sustaining the population in the cities.
Those who harbor the view of building a flat house is a better option believe that they can acquire larger living space and fresher air, which could be desirable for the environment. But unfortunately, this creates a trouble for the minority group of the population which can afford apartments but not a private big spaces for a house like a bungalow. In fact, living in apartment buildings can increase the social relationships between neighborhoods which is a positive development of society.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that building taller apartment buildings is a more reasonable and feasible way to create housing where every family can easily get shelter with all the amenities provided by residential societies.
- Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land Which approach is better in your opinion and why 84
- You have lost something on a bus and called customer service to get help You weren t happy with their response Write a letter to the bus company manager In your letter you should describe the item you lost explain why you weren t happy with the customer s 73
- Last month you travelled to another city You told a friend who lives in the city that you would meet them but you did not Write a letter to this friend In your letter apologise for not meeting him her explain why you did not contact him her earlier sugges 73
- one of your friend invited you and your family for a meal in his home Write a letter Thank them and tell what you enjoyed most How did you feel Also invite him with his family to your house 67
- You recently traveled by plane While you were at the airport a member of staff helped you with a problem and now you would like to show him her your appreciation Write a letter to the manager at the airport In your letter 1 explain what the problem was 2 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, while, as for, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38768115942 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95098186217 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590579710145 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.356626145 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.384615385 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392554276538 0.244688304435 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152625079311 0.084324248473 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518015471664 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257106330476 0.151304729494 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694397285377 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.