The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the percentage of international students graduating at university in eight states of Canada from 2001 to 2006.
At the first glance, it is clear that the proportion of non-native people graduating increased in all provinces. The largest share can be seen in New Brunswick.
In 2001, 7% of university graduated students was foreigners in New Brunswick, followed by Nova Scotia and Quebec, at about 6%. Alberta province recorded 5% of graduated students was not indigenous, while the figure for other remaining states were under 5%.
Turning to the year 2006, New Brunswick still took the lead, with the figure of 12%. Meanwhile, British Columbia experienced the fastest growth in the rate of international students graduating and shared the same figure with Nova Scotia, at above 10%. However, there was a slight fall in Alberta to 4% in this year. The proportions of non-native graduated students from Quebec, Manitoba, Newfoundland and Labrador and Ontario rose to between 6% and 8%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-25 | Vuthungan | 78 | view |
| 2021-12-01 | dangchan21 | 78 | view |
| 2021-04-19 | tranuyen | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-10 | Mohamad Alen Aliansyah | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-24 | fachryadul92 | 11 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 73
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s
- The pie graphs below show the result of a survey of children s activities The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in whereas the second graph shows the activities in which the girls participate
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, still, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22085889571 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91650531233 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638036809816 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4447831963 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5555555556 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208090786292 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854175188651 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740883208592 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14221138795 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784271533021 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.