The given bar chart illustrates the proportion of oversea students among 8 universities in Canada from 2001 to 2006.
Overall, it can be seen that both examined Canadian institutions had an upward trend regarding the percentage of international learners over a 5-year period. Meanwhile, New Brunswick was the most preferred destination for studying abroad in comparison with other universities.
In 2001, about 7% of the total graduates in New Brunswick came from other countries, which was nearly twice that of Ontario pilpuls. After a half of decade, the portion between international and foreign students in New Brunswick increased sharply, at 12% in 2006, which was also the highest figure recorded from the survey. Similarly, the percentage of international graduates in Ontario institution was twofold that of 2001.
In terms of the remaining universities, the year 2006 witnessed significant growth regarding the share of oversea learners. To be more specific, the figure rose from 6% to 10% in Nova Scotia, from 5.6% to 9% in Quebec. In 2001, the proportions of global pilpuls in Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba and Labrador were under 5%. Over a period of 5 years, these figure experienced overwhelming rises, reaching a threshold of 7.5%, 11%, 7% and 6.5%, respectively.
- The bar chart below shows the sector contributions to India s gross domestic product from 1960 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 86
- The diagram below shows how the leather goods are produced 84
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 84
- write a report describing the info below The flowchart below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans 78
- Some people think that travel is necessary to learn about other nations others however think that tv and internet is best way to learn discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1085.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34482758621 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07846697509 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645320197044 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.8804761863 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22649607107 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839025228192 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818249581745 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138617252553 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0819625478325 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.