Many people are working longer and longer hours. What are the reasons and effects?
It is generally the case that working continuously for extended hours is a common occurrence that many workers are facing to date. There are some reasons for this tendency, and I think that it could bring some negative impacts to both the employees themselves and the organizations they work for.
To begin with, several reasons could be explained why the majority of people stretch their working time. Firstly, in many cases, most workers find themselves incapable of managing their time effectively. In fact, if people procrastinate or fail to classify their priorities into important assignments, they may not have enough time to complete designated tasks, so working overtime would probably be a favorable option. Another reason is that as the industry competition has become fiercer than ever, many companies urge personnel to work overtime with a view to finish urgent tasks or meeting KPI so that their organizations can maintain the competitive edge. This is particularly true in this materialistic world where cost effectiveness and finance are prioritized.
This current tendency is not rare and it has induced a handful of negatively far-reaching implications on the working community. The first impact is that it can place a strain on employees’ relationships with their loved ones. Owing to prolonged working hours, it is fairly difficult for them to find the time to take care of families and meet friends. Accordingly, healthy rapports could be severed if this situation develops for a long time. Another potential impact is that corporations may also suffer from long-term damaging effects. Constant work at high frequency can result in body energy depletion and adversely affect mental and physical wellbeing of their staff, which leads to them being less productive and exposed to sickness risks. As a result, the absenteeism and turnover rates could increase and therefore, employers have to recruit and train new members on a regular basis. This activity could be time consuming and financially inefficient.
In conclusion, there are some justifications associated with both employees and employers to explain why many people choose to work longer hour. This tendency could cause a few undesirable impacts on the two key stakeholders as described above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-24 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
| 2024-09-21 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-09-18 | Meomeo11 | 78 | view |
| 2024-09-13 | Tuan Harry | 84 | view |
| 2024-08-06 | buiquan | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to 3 different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Despite better living standard and advanced health care system humans still face lots of deaths due to dangerous diseases like cancer or corona virus What do you think are the causes and what measures could be taken to tackle the problem 80
- The table below shows the questionnaire about the opinions of club members and the general public for the new theater in one town in 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The graph gives information about the number of people in Australia who used Chinese Arabic Italian or Greek as their first mother tongue Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
- It is widely known that despite cars damage the environment their manufacture and their use continue to increase Why is it the case How can this be controlled 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 245, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wo key stakeholders as described above.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, firstly, if, may, so, therefore, well, i think, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, in many cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1922.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35376044568 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96100671616 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596100278552 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.246244427 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.058823529 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1176470588 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.17647058824 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20903557304 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605473464882 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771090704414 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139732740337 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673065269532 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.