People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
__________
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
The character of a person is defined by examining his behavior and decision making skills when put under pressure and exigent conditions. Under such conditions being sangfroid is very important. It is important to think deliberately, keeping aside petty prejudices, weighing the pros and cons and then making a decision. There are two ways people react when put in difficult situation. One is where the situation overwhelms them, fear and anxiety kicks in, they can think straight and end up taking decision in fear or sometimes end up being irresolute and do not take a decision at all. Second is where the person first tries to understand the situation, he acknowledges it, he knows what he can and cannot do, he examines the positives of negatives of all possibilities and only when he is completely sure he takes a decision.
Getting overwhelmed by situations is not a negative aspect of a person, no body is born unflappable, instead it is something we learn or develop by facing difficult situations. Even when the situation overwhelms us we must not give in to fear because it undermines our ability to think straight. Poor decision makers are those who take their decisions based completely on emotion. They do not think, they go on according to their impulse and takes decisions hastily. When you take a decision based on impulse you end up loosing control over the situation. You have to accept the outcome of the situation whether it is suitable or not.
Poor decision makers are further identified by how they react after a particular situation has progressed after them taking a decision. If the decision taken by them in heat of the moment turns out to be good, they base it on impulsive capabilities and power of intuition. If the decision turns out to be a failure they tend to find reasons to explain as to why they took a particular decision. This is entirely opposite of the ideal situation. The ideal situation is the one wherein you take a decision because you want a particular result, in this case their is no justification needed later. Poor decision makers first make a decision and then assign importance to it based on what result it achieves, when ideally it should be otherwise. Thus I agree that poor decision makers can be categorized by their emotional response to a situation and then assigning value to the decision based on what results it achieves
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-30 | yixova3193 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | Truss | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | Adesina Boluwatito | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | shamika@25 | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-14 | RIYA MODI | 58 | view |
- Claim The emergence of the online blogosphere and social media has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States Reason When anyone can publish political opinions easily standards for covering news and political topics wil 54
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the 54
- Some people believe that increasing violence in the media is the cause of increasing violence in our society especially among children Others believe that children s peer groups and parental role models are a much more powerful influence on children s beh 66
- Claim An action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action Reason When assessing the morality of an action the results of the action are more important than the inte 58
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'nobody'?
Suggestion: nobody
...s is not a negative aspect of a person, no body is born unflappable, instead it is some...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 468, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ir impulse and takes decisions hastily. When you take a decision based on impulse yo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 556, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
... want a particular result, in this case their is no justification needed later. Poor ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 743, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...s, when ideally it should be otherwise. Thus I agree that poor decision makers can b...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, then, thus, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1981.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 409.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8435207824 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81426908323 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496332518337 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5550842113 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.263157895 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5263157895 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.10526315789 5.21951772744 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298511531684 0.243740707755 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10599329264 0.0831039109588 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101011260598 0.0758088955206 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209161245903 0.150359130593 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0840206397998 0.0667264976115 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'nobody'?
Suggestion: nobody
...s is not a negative aspect of a person, no body is born unflappable, instead it is some...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 468, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ir impulse and takes decisions hastily. When you take a decision based on impulse yo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 556, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
... want a particular result, in this case their is no justification needed later. Poor ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 743, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...s, when ideally it should be otherwise. Thus I agree that poor decision makers can b...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, then, thus, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1981.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 409.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8435207824 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81426908323 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496332518337 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5550842113 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.263157895 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5263157895 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.10526315789 5.21951772744 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298511531684 0.243740707755 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10599329264 0.0831039109588 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101011260598 0.0758088955206 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209161245903 0.150359130593 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0840206397998 0.0667264976115 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.