Concerning the issue of using technology as an alternative tool in education, some people do support this mater because of its benefits. However, others have opposite ideas. In this writing, both sides of this debate will be analyzed before reaching any conclusions.
From the one side, a plausible argument of supporters is that teaching by technology will being many benefits to all students in many aspects. First of all, it can be said with certainty that it takes less time to study at school. This is surely a positive feature because all classes can be held online so student just needs to download files lessons or homework on PC and studying. That is convenient for student who lives far away from school or in other countries. Second of all, a special consideration in this case is that accessing to learning resource. This is undoubtedly positive since some schools lack the resources to provide all of the courses that student may need. Advanced placements and foreign language courses can be particularly expensive for a school system to offer when there is not a high level of student demand. A variety of technologies, for instance, interactive television, Internet videoconferencing,...provide student the opportunity to participate in a class that is located in a different school, in a different town and even in a different state or country.
From the other side, those who disagree point out that there are a couple of shortcomings. Firstly, one of the disadvantages is that education is human activity. This is a clear limitation because students work best with as much human interaction as possible. Secondly, student who does not have the the technological skills required may not adapt to the use of this education tools. A further handicap may be source of funding. This is obviously negative because technology costs money.
Taking everything into account, for the above reasons, I firmly believe that the benefits of using technology as a learning tool outweigh its possible dangers. Therefore, I do totally support teaching by technology.
- In the past lectures were the traditional method of teaching large numbers of students Nowadays new technology is increasingly being used to teach students What are the advantages and disadvantages of this new approach 84
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005 78
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005 73
- Some people think that wild animals should not be kept in zoos Others believe that there are good reasons for having zoos discuss both these views and give your opinion 56
- The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 639, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...e schools lack the resources to provide all of the courses that student may need. Advanced...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 930, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...e television, Internet videoconferencing,...provide student the opportunity to par...
^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...le. Secondly, student who does not have the the technological skills required may not a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...le. Secondly, student who does not have the the technological skills required may not a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1737.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15430267062 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15229913675 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572700296736 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.4122066738 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4210526316 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7368421053 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.89473684211 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216823914798 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647535042911 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397372659831 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122856139811 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322107647998 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.