The given tabular depicts the information about the elder people and infants spent on food, electronic equipment, music and videos in the UK in 1998. The data has been calibrated in percentage.
Looking overall, is clear that the children more money spent on music, on the contrary side on video less expenditure by female in the same year.
To commence with, the ratio of adults who wasted money on diet and electronic equipment was 25% and 5%, respectively. However, the adults, male and female the music, was analogue which was collected at exactly 5%. The proportion of male varied significantly in food and electronic equipment, the former has 14% and later has 10%.
Furthermore, 40% female spent money on both items, comprising of 39% in food and remaining in electronic equipment. Nonetheless, does the lowest expenditure on videos than others. However, the ratio of boys wasted money on food was 9%, meanwhile electronic equipment has exactly trapped of it. While, the boys of lads on music 38% and videos 18%, which noticed a difference at 2% in given time of period. The proportion of girls in music was 40%, wears videos had 23% more.
- The chart below shows the percentage of whole world population in four countries from 1950 to 2000 with projections till 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Nowadays older people who need employment have to compete with younger people What problems does this cause and what are the solutions 56
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 85
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xpenditure by female in the same year. To commence with, the ratio of adults wh...
^^^
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., the adults, male and female the music, was analogue which was collected at exac...
^^
Line 7, column 52, Rule ID: COMPRISING_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprising' or 'consisting of'?
Suggestion: comprising; consisting of
..., 40% female spent money on both items, comprising of 39% in food and remaining in electronic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, look, nonetheless, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 964.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96907216495 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70731935012 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556701030928 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6039541411 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6363636364 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6363636364 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 5.23603664747 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0811289156089 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0316700141954 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431548855659 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0598860646988 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403375344289 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.